Beyond the Binary: Chapters 1-4 Response

Question 1 Response: 

Society uses the terms gender and sex interchangeably. However, sex is the technical term to refer to the sex that is chromosomally assigned at birth. Gender is how human beings identitfiy themselves. If a human being is a male chromosomally and female morphologically, then they are considered a male. On the other hand, if the person considers their gender to be female, then they are female. Although being female morphologically means having female form, sex is determined by chromosomes.  There could be sex sub-categories made; however, there are only XY chromosomes and XX chromosomes. When deciding sex chromosomally, there are only two possibilities. 


Question 2 Response:

When we see someone or meet someone, we assign a gender to someone. According to psychologists, Kessler and McKenna, this is called gender attribution, and we often do this without awareness.   It is possible to meet or interact with someone without performing a gender attribution. However, society has taught us that the norm if female or male, making it difficult to not create an attribution. After reading Kessler and McKenna’s claim, I realized that I often do this when walking down the street, especially when thinking to myself that someone’s outfit or shoes are cute. Without meeting them or knowing what pronoun they prefer, I attribute a gender.  I probably mentally attribute a gender when talking to someone, but I typically avoid pronouns in conversation. Since society uses masculinity and femininity to define people and gender, it is probably very difficult for society as a whole to stray away from attributing gender when looking at someone. 

Question 3 Response:

Aristotle believed that males and females coexist within the same species, but have different matter, which is the stuff something is made of. He believes that male and female organs are just two expressions of the same exact structure. Aristotle agrees with other philosophers that one’s sex is determined in the utero and the sex is determined on the temperature of the womb. Obviously with today’s technology and knowledge, we know that sexual reproduction and sex identification is not the ability to generate physical heat to concoct blood into form-bearing semen. Without the technology we have today, I can understand why Aristotle and other philosophers believed this. For the time period, as well, the center for these theories were males. I think if we didn’t have the technology we had today, there would definitely be multiple theories that center women or even have women as equals.  


Questions 4 Response:

I believe that religious text plays a heavy role within society, and has shaped the way society thinks and behaves towards one another. Throughout the centuries, religion has been a huge part of people’s daily life and has greatly influenced our culture. When understanding and interpreting religious text, theories of right versus wrong and societal norms are created. However, everyone, even people within the same religion, can interpret religious text differently causing opposing views. 

I believe that interpretation of religious text and societal norms are a two-way influence. Religious text can influence how society views gender and what’s right. As society’s view on gender changes, so does our interpretation of the religious text.  I was raised Catholic, and I went to a Catholic high school. I could tell that my high school only viewed gender as female and male without verbally saying so. We had to take Theology all four years, and we were taught a specific interpretation of the text. However, since I was raised to view that there are more than two genders, my interpretation of the religious text slightly opposed what I was taught by my teachers. Overall, culture and religion both influence each other, and how we view gender norms. 


Comments

  1. Hi Audrey!
    In response to question 2, I do the same thing as I am sure so many others do. I feel like so many of us have been taught from a young age that gender is just another identifiable thing about a person, almost like other things such as hair color or height. As you have said, our society uses masculinity and femininity to define things, and not just people. In our society, toys have gender, clothes, books, activities, even colors. We have been so accustomed to these things that it can be hard not to interact with people without performing a gender attribution. I think we just need to keep educating ourselves and allowing ourselves to grow from what we thought we knew. I do not know if I will ever be able to stop my mind from automatically performing gender attribution, but I can control my next thought and what I say. It reminds me of a phrase that I have heard a couple times, it's something along the lines of "Your first thought it what society has taught you but your next is what you have learned and grown yourself." I think that's an important thing to remember and to keep learning and growing from the toxic things that society has ingrained in us. I hope someday we can all get there!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Bri!
      I think that phrase is very accurate true. Typically our first thoughts are what society teaches us and our next thoughts on the topic show our growth and expansion of the topic. I think that phrase is great for this topic! I agree that it's important to continue to grow and learn from toxic things and hopefully everyone can one day see that.

      Delete
  2. Hi Audrey!

    I love the way you responded to question number one. I agree with you. I think that our society has really clouded the two (sex and Gender) creating it very hard for people to know have to pull them apart and understand them as different ways in which a person is. Thank you for all the responses it was so interesting to read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Audrey!
    In response to your answer to the first question, I agree that many people often confuse the concepts of sex and gender. In addition, you argued that "If a human being is a male chromosomally and female morphologically, then they are considered a male." But, from a biological standpoint it is a bit more complicated! I am a biology major, and in my genetics class we had an entire unit on Sex Determination. It is possible (and about as statistically common as having red hair) for a human being to be intersex, meaning that they are born with a reproductive, sexual anatomy, and other characteristics that don't fit the typical definitions of female or male. For a long time, people used chromosomes as the determining factor of sex, as you mentioned. But, the medical community has moved beyond that, because we have recognized that it is often much more complex. For instance, a person can have hormone levels that are typical of someone who would traditionally considered "male," but has XX chromosomes, traditionally female looking external anatomy, and traditionally male internal anatomy. Even more interestingly, there are other combinations of sex chromosomes that are very common! For instance, those who have XXY chromosomes have a condition called Klinefelter syndrome. It is possible to have XYY, X, XXX, and many, many more! This link takes you to an activity that we did in my class. It sheds some light on all the variation that exists in the world!
    https://media.hhmi.org/biointeractive/click/testing-athletes/case-studies--sprinter.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much for bringing this totally relevant content from your biology courses to bear on this topic Christina, this is incredibly helpful!

      Audrey, would you want to change anything about your response to question 1 in light of this information or do you stick by your original position? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

      Delete
    2. Thank you Christina! This is really interesting! I only know basic biology from high school, so this really incredible to know that the medical community has moved beyond. Since the medical community has moved beyond; I think more people should learn about this complex topic and I hope textbooks for basic high school biology starts to change. Although I'm not super interested in biology, I think this new information is very helpful and interesting to dive deep into. I would definitely have a different response to question 1, if I knew all of this complex biology. I still think sex and gender are terms that are commonly swapped and misunderstood as only female and male. Now knowing this new information, it is clear that the medical world is changing, but I think if everyone knew this information, then sex and gender would not be commonly only two categories.

      Delete
  4. Hi Audrey!

    I agree that it'll be difficult for cultures/society to ditch gender attributions. Especially since some cultures and religions enforce them, but maybe technology can change that. This is a little far-fetched, but Elon Musk is creating nanochips for (human's) increased cognition to keep pace with standalone AI programs. Maybe that's an avenue of change!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello,

      I think technology is a very interesting approach. I didn't even think of that as a possibility because I typically do not follow research on technology that far advanced. It could be a little far-fetched, but it could be a really interesting avenue for change!

      ~Audrey

      Delete
  5. Hi Audrey,

    You were super ambitious in taking on ALL of the blog post prompt options! Note that you only need to choose ONE. Focusing on one prompt that you find particularly interesting will allow you to dive deeper into that topic and really flesh out your reasoning on that topic.

    Just something to keep in mind for future posts.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Third Gender in Different Cultures

The Logic of the Traditional Family Ideals

Biological Differences in Gender